Analisis Pengaruh Iklim Keselamatan terhadap Keselamatan Pelayaran pada Perusahaan Pelayaran Kapal Penumpang di Surabaya
Abstract
This study examines the effect of safety climate on shipping safety. The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of the passenger ship safety climate on shipping safety. This study used a questionnaire as a data collection instrument with non-probability sampling techniques at the Port of Tanjung Perak Surabaya and 100 respondents who participated in this study. The inferential statistical method used in the analysis of research data is Partial Least Square (PLS). Instrument reliability is acceptable with Cronbach alpha values and composite reliability values above 0.70. The results of hypothesis testing in this study are that the safety climate has a significant effect on shipping safety. This means that to achieve shipping safety, the safety climate needs to be considered in indicators of safety procedures, communication and safety involvement of the crew. The conclusion of this study is that the safety climate in implementing the ISM Code promotes and disseminates a culture of safety, especially shipping safety on passenger ships.
References
D. Zohar, “Safety Climate : Conceptual and,” 2003.
D. M. DeJoy, B. S. Schaffer, M. G. Wilson, R. J. Vandenberg, and M. M. Butts, “Creating safer workplaces: Assessing the determinants and role of safety climate,” J. Safety Res., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 81–90, 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2003.09.018.
P. Anderson, ISM Code: A practical guide to the legal and insurance implications. taylorfrancis.com, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315720227/ism-Code-phil-anderson
F. W. Guldenmund, “The use of questionnaires in safety culture research - an evaluation,” Saf. Sci., vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 723–743, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.04.006.
R. Flin, K. Mearns, P. O’Connor, and R. Bryden, “Measuring safety climate: Identifying the common features,” Saf. Sci., vol. 34, no. 1–3, pp. 177–192, 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00012-6.
J. M. Beus, S. C. Payne, M. E. Bergman, and W. Arthur, “Safety climate and injuries: An examination of theoretical and empirical relationships,” J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 713–727, 2010, doi: 10.1037/a0019164.
M. A. Griffin and A. Neal, “Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation.,” J. Occup. Health Psychol., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 347–358, 2000, doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347.
S. E. Johnson, “The predictive validity of safety climate,” J. Safety Res., vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 511–521, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.07.001.
Ø. Dahl, J. Fenstad, and T. Kongsvik, “Antecedents of safety-compliant behaviour on offshore service vessels: a multi-factorial approach,” Marit. Policy Manag., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 20–41, 2014, doi: 10.1080/03088839.2013.780311.
D. A. Hofmann and A. Stetzer, “A cross-level investigation of factors influencing unsafe behaviors and accidents,” Pers. Psychol., vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 307–339, 1996, doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01802.x.
M. D. Cooper and R. A. Phillips, “Exploratory analysis of the safety climate and safety behavior relationship,” J. Safety Res., vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 497–512, 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2004.08.004.
H. Oltedal and E. Wadsworthz, “Risk perception in the Norwegian shipping industry and identification of influencing factors,” Marit. Policy Manag., vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 601–623, 2010, doi: 10.1080/03088839.2010.514954.
M. J. Akhtar and I. B. Utne, “Common patterns in aggregated accident analysis charts from human fatigue-related groundings and collisions at sea,” Marit. Policy Manag., 2015, [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03088839.2014.926032
P. Slovic, “Slovic_1987,” Science (80-. )., vol. 236, no. 4799, pp. 280–285, 1987.
R. E. Kasperson et al., “The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework,” Percept. Risk, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 232–245, 2016, doi: 10.4324/9781849772549-16.
T. rn Rundmo, “Associations and Safety Between Risk Perception,” Saf. Sci., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 197–209, 1996.
N. Pidgeon, “Risk assessment, risk values and the social science programme: Why we do need risk perception research,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 5–15, 1998, doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00114-2.
C. S. Lu, “The effect of safety climate on seafarers’ safety behaviors in container shipping,” Accid. Anal. Prev., vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1999–2006, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.06.008.
J. . G. T. M. H. C. M. R. M. S. Joseph F. Hair, A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)-Third Edition. 2021.
A. Pantouvakis and M. Karakasnaki, “An empirical assessment of ISM Code effectiveness on performance: the role of ISO certification,” Marit. Policy Manag., vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 874–886, 2016, doi: 10.1080/03088839.2016.1169451.
A. Goulielmos and E. Tzannatos, “The man-machine interface and its impact on shipping safety,” Risk Manag., 2019, [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429282515-25/man-machine-interface-impact-shipping-safety-alexander-goulielmos-ernestos-tzannatos
J. Tunidau, “Critical factors for successful implementation of the ISM Code in some Pacific Islands states,” WMU J. Marit. Aff., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 63–80, 2010, doi: 10.1007/BF03195166.
B. M. Batalden and A. K. Sydnes, “Maritime safety and the ISM Code: A study of investigated casualties and incidents,” WMU J. Marit. Aff., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 3–25, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s13437-013-0051-8.
